- |
-
Analysis the functional indicators in managing the governmental and nongovernmental sports organizations
Poster Presentation
Paper ID : 1013-11THCONF
Authors
1Allameh Tabataba'i University
2University Of Tehran
Abstract
Introduction: At the present time, the only effective way to make changes in the organization is to change the culture and the way of performance of managers through the change in the system of values, beliefs and inter accepted organizational relationships and regarding this, the appearance improvement of organizational performance becomes significant. The function means Group of important activities that is essential for achieving the goals and playing the role and in practice, would achieve the ideal goal. Tangen (2004), defines function as measurable results, decisions and organization steps which reveals the level of success and achievements. On the base of this, it can be said that organization functions are an interactive group of basic activities that helps organization to achieve its goals and calling in the course of serving to develop the society. (Tangen, 2004) Medori & and Steeple (2000) believe that organizations in order to develop, grow and gain sustainability to compete need to be able to measure their efficiency and effective and makes it possible to improve its functional state by reducing weakness and increasing strength (circular and Staples, 2000).
Methodology: The objective of this study is a field study. For arch sample, the data was gathered by the standard questionnaire of organizational knowledge prizes, Validi (1980).
Results: The results showed that in non-government organizations the components of the reward system were the most favorable conditions and component Goal identification had the worth conditions in government organization. I t was also shown that there is aspect of in functional management in the government and non-governmental sports organizations. There is a significant difference in functional aspect of management, including leadership components, goal identifying, organizational structures and reward systems in government and non-governmental sports organizations.
Discussion: non-government sports organizations to improve their organizational performance should pay special attention to the human resources as a main resource of organization. To Select the appropriate leadership style regarding the type of organization and the services which presents, Clarifying organizational goals for staff through their participation in goal identification, Determine the structure for organization to communicate closely and effectively with the least hierarchy between the manager and staff to express their problems in the field of their work and considering reward on the base of criteria and roles that the employee can have the best performance and motivation in the case of facing them.
Methodology: The objective of this study is a field study. For arch sample, the data was gathered by the standard questionnaire of organizational knowledge prizes, Validi (1980).
Results: The results showed that in non-government organizations the components of the reward system were the most favorable conditions and component Goal identification had the worth conditions in government organization. I t was also shown that there is aspect of in functional management in the government and non-governmental sports organizations. There is a significant difference in functional aspect of management, including leadership components, goal identifying, organizational structures and reward systems in government and non-governmental sports organizations.
Discussion: non-government sports organizations to improve their organizational performance should pay special attention to the human resources as a main resource of organization. To Select the appropriate leadership style regarding the type of organization and the services which presents, Clarifying organizational goals for staff through their participation in goal identification, Determine the structure for organization to communicate closely and effectively with the least hierarchy between the manager and staff to express their problems in the field of their work and considering reward on the base of criteria and roles that the employee can have the best performance and motivation in the case of facing them.
Keywords
Subjects